A very easy and simple video explaining Bayes Theorem

Must watch TED talk

Talks about how artificial intelligence algorithms are able to affect our opinions. We all are vulnerable, yes we ALL are.

Case against propensity scores

Here is an interesting video (couple of years old but still relevant)

CLABSI Trends and Parenteral Nutrition

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) harmful for patients and costly for the health system. Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are the most costly of HAIs (between 45K to 55K per CLABSI), increase length of stay by several days, and increase mortality by 15% to 40%. Although the rate of CLABSI has been decreasing since the institution of several preventive practices, the rates remain pretty high.

Patients who receive parenteral nutrition have more than 4-times higher risk of CLABSI than those who who do not receive parenteral nutrition. However the data on the risk of CLABSI risk since the institution of penalties for CLABSI by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) was not available, that was until the publication of study by Fonseca et al. They used data from all adult patient discharges between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, from 2 affiliated hospitals in a large health system in New York City. They conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to examine the relationship and temporal trends between parenteral nutrition and CLABSIs.

Of the 38,674 patients with central lines, 3517 developed CLABSIs. Of these 3517 patients, 767 patients were prescribed parenteral nutrition. Patients who were prescribed parenteral nutrition were 2.65 times more likely to have CLABSI than patients without parenteral nutrition. What this study shows is that there has been a decrease in the risk of CLABSI among patients who receive parenteral nutrition, although the risk remains much higher. Obviously, this study advocates for additional research to identifies strategies to decrease the risk of CLABSI in patients who receive parenteral nutrition.

Burnout

Burnout among healthcare workers, particularly physicians, has gained increasing attention recently. The societal expectation is that physicians will be selfless and put their patient’s needs first. Often physicians are expected to work long hours and do whatever it takes to help their patient and to go the extra mile; in other words give one's all. Burnout is further exacerbated by the changes in national health system and healthcare organizations; such changes are resulting in work environments that are high in demands and low in resources.

However, what is burnout is open to interpretation. Experts still debate about the dimensions of burnout. The most common burnout measurement tool, Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) assumes three dimensions of burnout; emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal accomplishment (PA). MBI has been criticized for its various aspects. For example, it measures three dimensions of burnout (EE, DP, PA) but recommends against merging those three dimensions to reach to the measurement of burnout itself. Thus, MBI is measuring three concepts but unable to define a single concept of burnout. Another criticism is that burnout is an amalgam of an individual state (EE), an undesirable coping strategy (DP), and result of the EE state (lack of PA). However, the biggest criticism of MBI is that it is not available in public domain.

The dimensions of burnout are open for discussion. While MBI, as noted above, considers that burnout has three dimensions, others consider burnout to have two or even one dimension; it is possible that burnout may have more than 3 dimensions. For example, Oldenburg Burnout Inventory considers only two dimensions of burnout out while Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) considers only one dimension of burnout.

Obviously, the disagreements about the definition and dimensions of burnout limit the study of effective interventions and have lead some to suggest that burnout perhaps does not exist as a separate entity on its own.